Laurie
Ihlenfield
My
project last semester focused on a more natural setting and the transcendental
experience. It also noted a loss of more
natural spaces and experiences. This semester
I have examined the environment I spend my day to day life in rather than a
space I escape to. I am deeply aware of
the obvious scientific environmental concerns that exist. I am exploring the
deeper philosophical implications of interactions with nature. I am exploring the constant battle for balance
and order and the constant tendency toward disorder.
I
came to the subject matter for this project as I sat in a park sketching
trees. I quickly realized that instead of
reflecting on this place I escape to I should instead reflect on the space I
interact with on a daily basis. I began taking
photos during my daily transit from the suburbs to the city. I walked around the city in the area surrounding
my studio making observations and taking photos. I drew from the window of my house and
photographed my neighborhood observing the patterns and nature existing in
these spaces.
What
I observed was a grid of concrete and glass towering over steeples and columned
institutions. Nearer my home I saw the
suburbs as a constant repetition of trees, mailboxes, and flowerbeds. I began to be very aware of the constant
change taking place around me. There was
this mix of old and new, a constant cycle of growth and destruction and growth
again. The push toward order was
constantly being challenged by nature and time.
In
questioning the grid I looked to geometric abstraction. The geometric form can be seen as an escape
from reality. The artist Agnes Martin
spoke of the square freeing one from right and wrong. She said, “Now I’m very
clear that the object is freedom”. (Stiles, p.31) She stated her work was “anti-nature”. I began to see this “anti-nature” as an
escape from the soul.
The
cube is an escape from the constant cycle of life and death. It is an escape from the unknown. The box is
the place of business where one carries out the day to day routine. Geometry is reflected in the flat patches of
land cleared away for rows of houses decorated with rows of trees and shrubs
and mailboxes and lamp posts. There is
order upon order.
While
the square, and order as a whole, can be an escape, it doesn’t really free us
from anything. The artist Robert Smithson said, “Grids and
plans subdivide the Earth into a global map.
Conflicts among all these orders produce disorder, which is not the
absence of order but rather a disparate combination of many orders.” (Smithson, 150)
The
piece hangs from the ordered grid of rusted concrete reinforcement steel. It is suspended from a network of yarn and
thread. A vine grows from the gridded pattern and begins to break from the grid
as it moves toward the bottom. In contrast to the grid, the ground is a tangled
network of vine created from yarn and thread.
The middle of the piece is a layering of thread drawings composed on a
delicate sheer fabric. Rows of trees,
lamp posts, and windows as well as abstracted construction barrels and signs
are “drawn” with thread into sheer fabric.
The fabric has an ephemeral quality that facilitates the discussion of
the fleeting nature of both the manmade and life in general. The gridded city
begins to give way to meandering vines toward the bottom as nature takes over
and the cycle is repeated.
In
the winter when I started this project the trees were bare and the only colors
were from the bricks and stone in the surrounding architecture. Looking out from my studio window there was
no sign of the change of seasons, no green.
My view consisted of nothing but buildings and a sliver of sky. In my project the color creeping in comes from
the vines that invade the city and the grid above. The green is both a sign of new life and a
reminder that the manmade does not endure.
In
exploring the philosophy of the landscape last semester I researched Immanuel
Kant. This semester I turned more to
science. I investigated such scientists
as Edward O. Wilson who talked about the importance of nature to our
well-being. Wilson coined the term
“biophilia”, or love of nature. I looked
at the research of Nancy Grimm at the University of Arizona. Grimm’s research studies the impact of the
mega city on the environment. Grimm
acknowledges the negative impact of the mega city on the environment. She holds out the hope that the city can also
be a place of positive change.
I
read about and had a studio visit with Dr. Nalini Nadkarni who researches the
environmental impact of the loss of the rainforest canopy. Dr. Nadkarni also is
a promoter of biophilia. It is her
involvement in many communities to promote awareness that interested me
most. Dr. Nadkarni has spoken to
religious groups about the spirituality of trees and the effect of trees on
healing. She has set up programs that
allow interaction with plant life in prisons. She continues to interact with
artists, musicians, dancers, and other scientists to promote her findings. I am interested in scientific fact but feel, as
do these scientists, that interactions with nature go deeper than surface
concerns of ecology. The spaces we inhabit and create for ourselves have a deep
effect on our well being. While most
realize the effect of lifestyle on the environment, Dr. Nadkarni acknowledges
the effect of the environment on man as well.
This
piece is not just an environmental reminder of the impact we have on our
planet. The piece speaks of man’s
tendency to create change without giving thought to the outcome. It
speaks of his desire to compartmentalize everything into order and box it in. It acknowledges the importance of the natural
in one’s daily environment.
Some
sense of order is necessary to survival.
Opening a dialogue that encourages people to come out of their boxes
provides a hope that we may strive to find a balance between man’s need for order
and nature.
Bibliography
Stiles, Kristine, Peter Selz: Theories and documents of Contemporary Art:
A Sourcebook of Artist’s Writings. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, University
of California Press, 1996
Smithson, Robert: Spiral
Jetty. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, University of California Press, 1972