Thesis Proposal



 
Thesis Proposal
 
 
Laurie Ihlenfield
9/19/2012


 

 


 

 

Laurie Ihlenfield

Ric Petry and Michael Goodson

Thesis Projects 1

26 September 2012

Thesis Proposal

 

            In my second semester project I explored the gridded structure of the city.  I discussed the cube as an escape of the harsh reality of life (war, sickness, decay, etc…).  I used thread and fabric to illustrate the pattern of entropy and growth found in the city.  I discussed the tension between the quest for balance and order in the city and the reality of the tendency of nature toward disorder. 



            Man clears away land to build.  Nature grows back.  Buildings fall into disrepair. Man rebuilds and repairs the city, each time adding to the framework of the city.  New structures are added. Style and ornamentation of a period reflect the ideals of the period.  Old thought is declared wrong and new “truths” are ushered in just as structures and styles come and go.  This updated city creates an interesting juxtaposition of both old and new thought and old and new architecture.  Religious, political and social ideals change through time.  I find this interesting as truth remains.  Seeing the odd juxtaposition of the cathedral next to the modernist skyscraper is a fascinating reminder of change in values.
           This odd juxtaposition of old and new is what I plan to focus on this semester.  As I worked on my project last semester I began to appreciate the city as this fascinating yet bizarre collage of architecture, nature, and ornament.  Each building is a testament to the ideals of the era in which it was built.  As I thought about my new project I began researching the interaction between man and the physical reflection of history, production, society, and culture on the environment man creates to live and work in.  In researching the ornamental compared to the sociological aspects of the city I read selections from artists Robert Smithson, Stephan Willats, and landscape architect Charles Jencks.  All provided groundwork to begin research for my project.

            I read Smithson’s writings with regard to entropy.  In reading the piece I connected to the idea that the physical city is a reflection of the mindset of the city.  Smithson wrote of the city as a representation of current thought in art and architecture gleaned from the actual structure and condition of the physical city itself.  Smithson’s city was barren of expression.  He wrote:

“This “City” performs no natural function; it simply exists between mind and matter, detached from both, representing neither.  It is, in fact, devoid of all classical ideals of space and process.  It is brought into focus by a strict condition of perception, rather than by any expressive or emotive means.  Perception as deprivation of action and reaction brings to the mind the desolate, but exquisite, of the empty “box” or “lattice.” (Smithson)

I think that the architecture and ideals of the soaring cathedrals give way to the “empty box that Smithson speaks of. The idea of form takes over the idea of expression.

            The cathedral represents to me a structured religion while the steel skyscraper represents a denial of spirit and a fascination with the machine.  Seeing the two opposites standing next to each other in the city is interesting to me. Smithson speaks of two cities, one a mental image of the ideals of the city and the other the physical city itself. In Smithson’s mind the two were detached in the modern city. As I see it the city was a physical representation of the soul.  It was unconnected to concept and ideals as was the modernist thought. It was a city that concentrated solely on form.

 
            My project and my research will investigate the interaction between my physical work, the mental impact of the “city” of which Smithson speaks (the ideals of the city), and the physical city itself. Smithson was a catalyst for thought on my project. I began the concept for this project through my fascination of the structure and ornament of the city.  I realized the city itself (its physical makeup) is a representation of the overall ideals of the city.  I find Smithson’s combination of the new modernist buildings sitting next to the ornamentation of old cathedrals and institutions to be intriguing as all tell a story of the city and the mindset of its inhabitants.

            Landscape architect and writer Charles Jencks refers to the cold and impersonal modernist architectures “devoid of classical space and process” as,

 “inarticulate building, so intent on the purity of its language and the perfection of its solution that it ignored the particular needs of its clients, the social significance of given buildings, in short, the whole question of decorum, the suitability of artistic means to ends.  Ornament, it turns out, is crucial to some of these ends: “there are a number of practical necessities that ornament is uniquely able to satisfy.  The most obvious is the need for identification: telling people what an object or building is, or what purpose it is intended…Ornament makes places legible.” (Steiner, 117)

Ornament provides not only a physical reading of the city but an historical reference of it.   As architectural styles come in and out of vogue, so do the societal ideals and beliefs.  Romanticism gives way to modernism which gives way to post-modernism.        

            In my thesis piece I plan to use mixed media, mainly sewing, to introduce the idea of the city as a collage of various periods in history.  Each period in history is representative of a particular way of thinking.  Buildings such as the gothic cathedrals of the Romantic era reached for the heavens and sought to inspire those who were seeking spirituality.  The skyscraper was an emblem of commerce and capitalism and a testament to success.  The two sit side by side in the city in this odd juxtaposition of old and new ideals and architecture.

             My city is to be a mixed media, predominantly sewn, piece that weaves architecture and ornament throughout. At the moment I am thinking it will consist of large scale-pieces that the viewer would walk through.  I chose sewing as a means of expression for this project as it has a long relationship to ornament. Sewing is a private and personal way to create an intimate expressive space.  Placing the sewn work on a gridded structure provides the mix of impersonal functional space (as in Smithson’s city) with a more private human expression through ornamentation.  This is representative of the mix of ideals and physical structures that make up the city and tell of its history.

            I will research the history of ornament to gain further understanding of the ideals that formed the signs and symbols of the city.  I believe Ornamentation in modernist architecture has in more recent history been thought of as a bourgeoisie excess. It seems to me the tides turned and ornament began to return through the use of modern materials in buildings such as the Phillip Morris AT&T building and the Harold Washington Library in Chicago.  Likewise ornamentation began to make an appearance in the art world. 

Harold Washington Library

             Through research of the historical use of ornament in architecture and art I plan to discuss the impact of ornament on the urban environment.  I will explore the relationship of humans to the spaces they create to live and work in.  In response I plan to create an environment that evinces this relationship in a physical three dimensional space made up of large scale panels or pieces.

            I am looking to several contemporary artists.  Many don’t share my aesthetic but evoke similar thoughts.  The artists I have looked at most recently in relation to my work are Judy Pfaff and Dana Melamed. Both are creating complex compilations of materials in three dimensional spaces. Each shares interesting observations through their art.

In an interview with Richard Whittaker, Judy Pfaff shares the relationship of her observations to her art.  She says, “The finished piece always feels like evidence to me—summations of what I’ve been thinking about.”(Whittaker)   In the same way I plan to use my art as a “summation” of my thoughts on the complex juxtapositions of both the physicality of the city and the sociological nature of the city as seen through ornamentation.   

            Artist Dana Melamed uses the structures of the city to portray a menacing view of the city. An article in Art News Magazine had this to say about Melamed, “The artist’s imaginary, yet all-too-real, dystopian cityscapes are visions of an urban environment that continually destroys itself even as it is being rebuilt. “(Levin, 125) I see the cityscape as an environment that continually evolves. Each new era adds to the cityscape through ornament and architecture reflective of the collective ideals that comprise that culture.  I do not see that evolution as being solely “dystopian”.  I see that evolution as evidence of the ideals of man physically expressed in the spaces he creates as old thought gives way to new.  The one constant is change.  Although man changes styles and ideals over time, and builds and rebuilds, real “truths” remain. 

Diana Melamed, Magnitude of Change, 2011,
Transparency film, Cinefoil, wire, paper, ink and acrylic
on aluminum mesh, 30” x 18” x 7”.  The Lobby Gallery.

 
In conclusion, my proposal is to create a three dimensional piece in fabric and thread that reflects my observations of the city as a juxtaposition of physical structure, ornament and the complexity that I see in the sociological ideas.  I plan to research the historical influences dictating ornament and discuss periods in art and culture as well as political and social shifts in relation to architecture and ornament.  I plan to research work of contemporary artists including but not limited to Judy Pfaff and Diana Melamed, Louise Nevelson, and Sarah Sze.   I plan to create work that speaks of the juxtaposition of old ideals and new as expressed in the architecture and ornament of the city.

 
Additional Artists

Kirsten Hassenfeld

Louise Nevelson

Sarah Sze


 

 

Bibliography

 
Adamson, Glenn. Thinking through Craft. Oxford: Berg, 2007. Print.
Levin, Kim. "Dana Melamed: The Lobby Gallery." ARTnews Summer 2012: 125. Print.

Smithson, Robert. "Entropy And The New Monuments." Robert Smithson. Estate of Robert Smithson, n.d. Web. Mar.-Apr. 2012.   .Unpublished Writings in Robert Smithson: The Collected Writings
Steiner, Wendy. Venus in Exile: The Rejection of Beauty in Twentieth-century Art. New York: Free, 2001. Print.

Trilling, James. Ornament: A Modern Perspective. Seattle: University of Washington, 2003. Print.
Richard, Whittaker. "Interview: Judy Pfaff: The Interior Landscape." Works and Conversations (1995): n. pag. Conversations. Works   and Conversations. Web. Jan.-Feb. 2011. .

Willats, Stephen. Between Buildings and People. London: Academy Editions, 1996. Print.

 

           

 


 

Production Plan

September: 

Art:      Experiment with materials.  

Research Paper:  Continue reading to add to proposal.

October:

Art:       Develop small sketch for piece        

            Develop base structure for work to hang panels from

            Revise timeline as necessary based on sketch

Research Paper: Create research paper outline. Continue research

November:

Art:      Construct and add to panels

Research Paper:  Continue research and writing

December: 

Art:   Continue to add to piece

Research Paper:  Complete Rough Draft

January - February:

Art:  At this time I plan to have the base hanging structure and panels complete.  From January through February I will add finishing touches

Research Paper:  Continue to revise and complete rough draft

March:

Hang work and complete paper


 

Budget


I have purchased $86 in supplies for this project so far.

I am budgeting for the possibility of the following future purchases:

Organza for the base of the panels – ($6.50/yard) x 4 each 4’ x 8’ panels = $78

Thread and notions $30

Fabric Stabilizer ($25.99 per 12” x 9’ roll) x 4 = 104

Lumber for hanging structure $100

 

Total: $398